The National Review Online recently featured an analysis of Florida Congressman Alan Grayson questioning whether the often over-the-top Democrat even wants to be re-elected. His recent antics truly call this into question. Furthermore, his pre-existing personal fortune would suggest that he does not really need the work (or the opportunities and connections that come with serving in Congress). In short, he does not have much personal skin in the electoral or political game.
Which leads us to another question: If all House members were destined to serve only a short pre-determined maximum amount of time, would more be prone to act out openly like Grayson?
Sunday, April 11, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(131)
-
▼
April
(20)
- A Good Lead For Dems On The Hill This November.
- Maybe The New York Times Got This One Right.
- That Old Time Religion.
- Conservatives Should Reluctantly Support McCain.
- An Example Of What Is Wrong With Politics.
- A Bad Use Of Resources.
- This Day In New York Times History.
- Charlie Crist Is No Joe Lieberman
- Larry Kudlow On Tax Day.
- This Is Why You Don't Take Your Work To Happy Hour.
- The Evil “L” Word.
- The British Bill Clinton?
- It Is Just So Well Written!
- Congressman Grayson And The Florida Tea Party Party.
- Fat Americans And Their Fast Food!
- Would Term Limits Create More Alan Graysons?
- More Sage Wisdom From The New York Times
- The "Congressman From ACORN" Has A Meltdown At Per...
- "W" Finds A Place To Wipe His Hand.
- Will Google Have An Easter Theme Tomorrow?
-
▼
April
(20)
No comments:
Post a Comment